Module 1
Map recurring work
Identify the input, output, reviewer and frequency of a task. Prioritize a clear, bounded workflow over an entire job description.
Foundation program
Practise AI-assisted writing, meetings, reporting and research while measuring review effort and protecting work quality.
The practical answer
AI productivity training helps employees apply AI to repeatable work such as preparing drafts, organizing notes and comparing information. NMR Infotech scopes exercises around real task patterns and teaches participants to account for checking and correction time when assessing usefulness.
Audience
Employees and managers handling recurring knowledge work. The program can bring multiple departments together for a shared foundation, followed by role-specific practice.
Adaptable curriculum
Module 1
Identify the input, output, reviewer and frequency of a task. Prioritize a clear, bounded workflow over an entire job description.
Module 2
Turn an approved brief into a first draft with explicit facts and constraints. Review tone, completeness and unsupported claims before use.
Module 3
Extract actions and status from permitted notes without inventing commitments. Preserve unresolved questions and missing information.
Module 4
Ask for sources, open them and check what they support. Separate finding useful references from making an accountable decision.
Module 5
Compare manual and assisted completion against the same quality standard. Include preparation, review, corrections and tool overhead.
Hands-on examples
Use synthetic project notes with an access blocker and an absent update. Produce a useful report, verify every material statement and record the corrections needed.
Use equivalent permitted inputs for a manual and an AI-assisted attempt. Record total time and quality issues; discuss what the small test can and cannot establish.
These are proposed learning exercises using synthetic or permitted inputs, not client case studies or claims of measured outcomes.
Learning checks
Plan the session
Share the participants’ roles, experience, approved tools and two or three recurring tasks. We can then discuss a suitable briefing, workshop or longer learning path, with delivery online, on-site or hybrid subject to agreed scope and arrangements.
The proposed curriculum is a starting point. Duration, prerequisites, software access, materials, follow-up support and fees are agreed in the engagement brief. Participants should have access to the selected tool; any licensing or administrator requirements need confirmation before the session.
No. The effect depends on the task, starting process, tool access, review requirements and adoption. Training can help a team design a meaningful comparison; any claimed improvement needs measured evidence.
Yes, where the organization has explicitly approved both the material and the tool used to process it. Public or synthetic examples provide an alternative when that approval is not available.
Related learning
Practise source-grounded reporting.
Explore report-creation exampleExplore transparent assumptions about task time.
Explore opportunity calculatorTest one workflow before extending its scope.
Explore plan an ai pilotYour next chapter with AI
Tell us what you want to train, improve, automate or build.